Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 560 SW2D 379 - State v. Singleton

State v. Singleton’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 1990
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 1990

6 state decisions

30197719801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Adams v. Williams · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Draper v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While the sole justification for the ‘pat-down’ search pursuant to an investigative stop is to discover weapons that could be used for an assault, Terry, 88 S.Ct. at 1884 , it is clear that other evidence discovered in the course of such a search can be seized. Sibron [v. New York, 392 U.S. 40 ], 88 S.Ct. [1889] at 1905 [ 20 L.Ed.2d 917 (1968)] (White, J., concurring) and 88 S.Ct. at 1910 (Harlan, J., concurring). The cameras found on appellant’s person in this case were properly admitted into evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.