Wolfe v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 2016
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McDonald v. State · Ex Parte Murchison · Ex Parte Moffett · Gaines v. State · Glenn v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Without that transcription, we are unable to ascertain whether other evidence was introduced to support the appellant’s conviction. We therefore hold that that the appellant’s contention does not fall within the purview of Ex parte Moffett, supra, but is merely an impermissible attempt to collaterally attack the sufficiency of the evidence. Appellant’s contention is overruled....””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Williams“[t]he record before us supports the appellant's contention”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Dantzler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.