Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

560 S.W.2d 69

State v. Macklin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 1977

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1977-12-15

Relies on Baker v. Modern Woodmen of America · City of Clayton v. Sigoloff

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1977-12-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2017

2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

5019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

TITUS, Judge.

¶1On July 1, 1977 (Case No. 10732) defendant was sentenced upon conviction of second degree burglary and stealing. On November 23,1977 (Case No. 10864) defendant was convicted of two counts of first degree robbery by means of a dangerous and deadly weapon, and on November 29, *701977 (Case No. 10866) defendant was sentenced upon conviction of breaking custody. He timely appealed from these judgments of conviction and those appeals are now pending in this court.

¶2Defendant did not make bond pending appeal in any of these cases. On December 9, 1977, defendant was killed while in the custody of the Department of Corrections. Having expired before the above enumerated charges against him were finally determined, the prosecutions against defendant wholly abated and there was no conviction of him in any of the causes within the contemplation of the law. City of Clayton v. Sigoloff, 452 S.W.2d 315 (Mo.App.1970); Scott v. American Express Co., 233 S.W. 492 (Mo.App.1921), cert. quashed State ex rel. Scott v. Cox, 243 S.W. 144 (Mo.1922); Baker v. Modern Woodmen of America, 140 Mo.App. 619, 121 S.W. 794 (1909); 83 A.L.R.2d 864, et seq.; Annot., Criminal Case-Death Pending Appeal.

¶3During his lifetime, defendant was never finally convicted of the crimes charged and his death served to abate the prosecutions against him. Consequently, this court has no viable cause before it and the appeal in each involved case is hereby dismissed.

¶4It is so ordered.

All concur.
/560/sw2d/69 · .json · Public domain