Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 560 SW3D 205 - Jacobs v. State

Jacobs v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana))

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Irvin v. Dowd · Morgan v. Illinois · Mu'Min v. Virginia · Ham v. South Carolina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To constitute an abuse of discretion, the trial court's voir dire limitation must render the defendant's trial fundamentally unfair.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.