State v. Lauriat’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 1811 · 16 U.S.C. § 1855 · 16 U.S.C. § 1856
Relies on Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul · Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. · Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. Coyne · Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It shall be unlawful to fish for or take lobsters by use of an otter or beam trawl, a scallop drag or trawl, seine or net or to have in possession any lobsters, regardless of their source, on board any boat rigged for otter or beam trawling, scallop dragging or trawling, seining or netting.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hayes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.