Bromley v. Crisp’s Empirical Analysis
561 F.2d 1351 · 1977
Citation profile
70 federal appellate · 6 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 108 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Dyer v. Calderon (1998), Brinlee v. Crisp (1979)
70 federal appellate · 6 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Brady v. United States · Fay v. Noia · McMann v. Richardson · Brown v. Allen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 108 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We feel, however, that in deciding these habeas cases and in fashioning a remedy as ‘law and justice require,’ 28 U.S.C.A. § 2243 , see Garatas v. LaVallee, 391 U.S. 234, 239 [ 88 S.Ct. 1556, 1560 , 20 L.Ed.2d 554 ] ... we can exercise restraint and need not grant such ‘drastic relief’ as petitioner seeks for the denial of equal protection. See Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541, 565 [ 86 S.Ct. 1045, 1059 , 16 L.Ed.2d 84 ] ... . If the court is clearly convinced that the juvenile court would have certified the petitioner for treatment as an adult, we believe the essential justice and basic fairness standard of the Radcliff case is satisfied without violence to the habeas remedy or State law.” 561 F.2d, at 1356 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an appellate court will not depart from a rule of law established on an earlier appeal in deciding the same issues, except for cogent reasons”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“holding a conviction invalid and granting the writ do not generally bar retrial on the original charge,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.