Dunn v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
561 F.2d 259 · 1977
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1992
8 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 5010 · 26 U.S.C. § 7237
Relies on United States v. Glasgow · United States v. Evers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the court is of the opinion that the youth offender does not need commitment, it may suspend the imposition or execution of sentence and place the youth offender on probation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“within the strict meaning of the word); United States v. Becker, 536 F.2d 471, 473 (1st Cir. 1976) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. EDEN
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.