In the Matter of Floyd Raymond Woods Appeal of Judith Jean Crabb Objecting’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently February 2009 · most notably Martin First Federated Life Insurance Co v. A Martin, Hill v. Hill (In Re Hill) (1995)
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Shula v. Shula · McDaniel v. McDaniel · Mary Lee Nichols v. Benton M. Hensler · 167 Ind. App. 459 - White v. White · 148 Ind. App. 496 - Boshonig v. Boshonig
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether the settlement agreement includes provision for payments to the ex-spouse; (2) whether there is any indication that the [award to the obligee spouse] was intended to balance the relative income of the parties; (3) whether the [award to the obligee spouse] is in the midst of provisions allocating property; and (4) whether the [award to the obligee spouse] describes the character and method of payment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The record before the bankruptcy judge and the district court consisted .of a copy of the divorce decree and that separation agreement incorporated therein, but does not conclusively reveal the intent of the divorce court or of the parties in including the disputed term. The law of Indiana, therefore, determines whether Woods’ assumption of the parties’ debts is to be construed as dividing the marital property or as providing support for Judith.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.