Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

561 F.2d 630

Docket No. 76-1065.

Hardwick v. Doolittle

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 25, 1977.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1977-10-25

3 counsel of record

Relies on Hardwick v. Doolittle

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1977-10-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 2018

9 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

7019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1On Denial of Rehearing

¶2Bobby Hardwick, pro se.

¶3A. Russell Blank, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner-appellant.

¶4Richard L. Powell, Augusta, Ga., Robert C. Daniel, Jr., Richmond County Atty., Augusta, Ga., for respondents-appellees.

¶5ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

¶6Before TUTTLE, CLARK, and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

¶7PER CURIAM:

¶8Appellant points out that our prior opinion did not expressly deal with his contentions of systematic exclusion of blacks, women, and citizens 18 through 24 years of age from jury service; the right to a hearing on his second special plea of insanity; the delay in bringing a second indictment which violated his rights to a speedy trial; the delay of his retrial past the time set in a prior federal habeas order; and denial of counsel. Each of these matters was thoroughly considered by the panel and found to be lacking in merit.

¶9The petition for rehearing filed by appellant is DENIED, and no member of this panel nor judge in regular active service on the court having requested that the court be polled en banc, (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

/561/f2d/630 · .json · Public domain