United States v. Mapp’s Empirical Analysis
561 F.2d 685 · 1977
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably United States v. Serlin (1983), Carlson v. United States (1997)
22 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7201
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Beckwith v. United States · Barrett v. United States · Del Toro v. United States · Mayo M. Goff v. New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“noncustodial interrogation might possibly in some situations, by virtue of some special circumstances, be characterized as one where 'the behavior of ... law enforcement officials was such as to overbear the petitioner's will to resist and bring about confessions not freely self-determined....'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States v. Chu“while a revenue agent might know of fraud, he must still, in his discretion, decide when the investigation has progressed to the point at which he has enough information so that the Intelligence Division can make an informed decision on whether or not to undertake a criminal investigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“in violation of the guidelines in the Internal Revenue Manual. In the first place, we held that the rules in the Internal Revenue Manual were adopted for the internal administration of the service and not for the protection of the taxpayer and therefore”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.