Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 561 F.2d 719 - Turchick v. United States

Turchick v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

561 F.2d 719 · 1977

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
states following
October 2021
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently October 2021 · most notably Aiello v. City of Wilmington (1980), J-R Distributors, Inc. v. Eikenberry (1984)

18 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

120197719801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 50 U.S.C. § 3811

Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp · Grayned v. City of Rockford · Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District · Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the overbreadth doctrine permits the facial invalidation of laws that inhibit the exercise of First Amendment rights if the impermissible applications of the law are substantial when judged in relation to the statute's plainly legitimate sweep.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “The aim of facial overbreadth analysis is to eliminate the deterrent or chilling effect an overbroad law may have on those contemplating conduct protected by the First Amendment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Forms of conduct that express ideas without significantly interferring with legitimate state interests are privileged under the First Amendment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.