Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 561 F.3d 62 - Oroh v. Holder

Oroh v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis

561 F.3d 62 · 2009

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
October 2024
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2024

8 federal appellate ·

70200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Laeila Nelson Stephanie Nelson Phil Nelson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Pan v. Gonzales · Pulisir v. Mukasey · Ortiz-Salas v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]n application for asylum of an alien may be considered, notwithstanding [the one-year limitations period], if the alien demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Attorney General either the existence of changed circumstances which materially affect the applicant’s eligibility for asylum or extraordinary circumstances relating to the delay in filing an application within the [statutory] period.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “due process demands a 'reasonably accurate [and] reasonably complete transcript,' or an adequate substitute, to allow for meaningful and adequate appellate review”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “file[s] the application 'within a reasonable period' given those circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.