Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

561 F.3d 655

Docket No. 08-1775.

Bell v. Jones

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 2009.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2009-04-14

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2009

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-04-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Derrick Bell, Carson City, MI, pro se.

¶2Raina I. Korbakis, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Michigan Attorney *656General, Appellate Division, Brenda E. Turner, Office of the Attorney General, Habeas Corpus Division, Lansing, MI, for Respondent-Appellee.

¶3Before: MERRITT, MARTIN, and SUHRHEI RICH, Circuit Judges.

¶4ORDER

¶5Derrick Bell, a pro se Michigan prisoner, petitions the court to rehear en banc an order denying him a certificate of appeala-bility. The motion has been referred to this panel of three judges, two of whom are senior judges, on which the original deciding judge does not sit, for a determination on the merits of the petition for rehearing. We conclude that the original deciding judge did not misapprehend or overlook any point of law or fact when he issued his order, and, accordingly, declines to rehear the matter. Fed. R.App. P. 40(a).

¶6The Clerk shall now refer the matter to all of the active eligible members of the court for further proceedings on the suggestion for en banc rehearing.

/561/f3d/655 · .json · Public domain