Stewart v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
561 F.3d 679 · 2009
Citation profile
70
cited by 70 later decisions
April 2019
most recently cited
16 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Pierce v. Underwood · Thomas v. Barnhart · Bayliss v. Barnhart · Clifford v. Apfel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The EAJA provides that a district court may award attorney's fees where (1) the claimant was a 'prevailing party,' (2) the government's position was not 'substantially justified,' (3) no special circumstances make an award unjust, and (4) the claimant filed a timely and complete application with the district court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jensen v. Berryhill“When an ALJ poses a hypothetical question to a vocational expert, the question must include all limitations supported by medical evidence in the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moreno v. Berryhill“unless the court finds that the position of the United States was substantially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jensen v. Berryhill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.