Hampton v. Ford Motor Co.’s Empirical Analysis
561 F.3d 709 · 2009
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably Galardi v. Naples Polaris, L.L.C. (2013), Kristofek v. Village of Orland Hills (2013)
5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co. · 104 Ill. 2d 317 - Rakowski v. Lucente · Skycom Corporation v. Telstar Corporation · 225 Ill. App. 3d 68 - Myers v. Health Specialists, S.C.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reason to believe that the parties 'couldn't have meant what they seem to have said,'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.