Dawson v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
561 F.3d 930 · 2009
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 16 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. United States Bureau of Land Management (2009), 374 F. App'x 821 - Christensen v. Big Horn County Board of County Commissioners (2010)
1 federal appellate · 16 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 47 · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Thomas v. Arn · Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor · Roell v. Withrow · United States v. Silverman · United States v. Howell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“De novo review means that the [IJ] does not defer to the [asylum officer's] ruling but freely considers the matter anew, as if no decision had been rendered below.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.