Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 561 F. Supp. 2d 99 - Hampton v. Schafer

561 F. Supp. 2d 99 - Hampton v. Schafer’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
August 2017
most recently cited

4 district ·

Relationships

Applies 22 U.S.C. § 4010

Relies on Park v. Howard University · Brown v. Marsh · Salleh v. Christopher · 538 F. Supp. 2d 44 - Bouknight v. District of Columbia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “I was hired by the Metropolitan Police Department as a Police Officer on 10/23/88. In April 2008, my employer discriminated against me and continues to [do] so by sexually harassing me and retaliating against me. Sgt. Eric Leven-berry sexually harasses me on a continuous basis. For example, he has asked me out on dates [and engaged in several other harassing behaviors].... Finally, because I have refused Sgt. Levenber-ry’s advances, he has retaliated against me. For example, he began to make disparaging remarks about me to others in the office. I worry that he will physically hurt me if he is able to be alone with me. I believe that I have been discriminated against because of my sex (sexual harassment), in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.