Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 561 NE2D 487 - Daniels v. State

Daniels v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
10
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently April 2014 · most notably Bivins v. State (1995), Kersey v. Hatch (2010)

2 federal appellate · 57 state decisions — followed in 10 states

370199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Teague v. Lane · Murray v. Carrier · Griffith v. Kentucky · Penry v. Lynaugh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “certain kinds of primary, private individual conduct beyond the power of the criminal law-making authority to proscribe,”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “is generally not applicable to those cases on collateral review, that is, those which have become final before the new rule was announced.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a case announces a new rule if the result was not dictated by precedent existing at the time the defendant's conviction became final.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.