Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 561 NE2D 776 - Smedley v. State

Smedley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
August 1996
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Unimet Corp. v. United Steelworkers · Brendale v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation · Belisle v. Anzivino

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For sudden heat to reduce murder to manslaughter, there must be sufficient provocation to arouse the emotions of an ordinary person so as to obscure his reasoning powers.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We see little danger of prejudice from such a general characterization of the case as alleged in counsel's verbatim objection. Moreover, we observe that appellant never requested the trial court to question the jurors whether they had been prejudiced by any such remarks.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.