Watson v. Watson’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1997
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 5 Utah 2d 79 - Wilson v. Wilson · 24 Utah 2d 236 - Wiese v. Wiese · 19 Utah 2d 378 - Stone v. Stone · 9 Utah 2d 244 - Barker v. Dunham · 26 Utah 2d 277 - Harding v. Harding
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e approach the problem here presented in full awareness of the standard rules which favor the findings, judgments and decrees of the trial court, particularly in divorce matters. Notwithstanding this, the right of review on appeal has its purposes .... [This court] would be remiss in its responsibility and this assured right of appeal would be meaningless if it unquestioningly accepted all actions of the trial court and remained insensitive to pleas to rectify inequity or injustice. Consequently, the rule is that when it is made to appear that the court has failed to correctly apply principles of law or equity, ... or that the judgment has so failed to do equity that it manifests a clear abuse of discretion, this court on review will take appropriate corrective action in the interests of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Willey v. Willey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.