Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

561 So. 2d 1200

Onofrio v. Onofrio

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1990-03-20

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1991

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-03-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We grant appellant’s motion for clarification of our order dismissing her appeal, vacate the dismissal, and reinstate the appeal.

¶2Cezarina Onofrio moved for summary judgment pursuant to rule 1.510, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, in her action to set aside a judgment as void. The trial court denied her motion, and she appealed. This court concluded that the order appealed was not an appealable non-final order, and dismissed the appeal. Onofrio sought clarification, urging that although her motion requested summary judgment pursuant to rule 1.510, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, the ground on which it was predicated was that the underlying judgment was void, and thus the judgment was an appealable, non-final order under rule 9.130(a)(5), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, as an order entered on motion pursuant to rule 1.540, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. The committee note to rule 9.130(a)(5), Florida Rules of Appellate Pro*1201cedure, states that the rule applies to orders on motions which enumerate any of the grounds set forth in rule 1.540, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Because a void judgment is a ground for relief from judgment pursuant to rule 1.540(b)(4), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, we reinstate the appeal.

/561/so2d/1200 · .json · Public domain