561 So. 2d 1254 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 529 So. 2d 726 - Hightower v. State · 455 So. 2d 385 - Stafford v. State · 489 So. 2d 1236 - Carson v. State · 486 So. 2d 528 - Van Tassel v. Coffman · 555 So. 2d 450 - Peters v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must be substantial and the willful and substantial nature of the violation must be supported by the greater weight of the evidence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The fact that [the defendant] was mistakenly released from custody before serving a prison sentence did not terminate that sentence and commence his probation. The appellant's probation will not commence until he serves his prison sentence.... His failure to report four years before he is scheduled to start his probation does not constitute a willful or substantial violation of his probation in this case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.