Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

561 So. 2d 1280

Dinks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1990-05-23

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1991

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-05-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The appellant, fifteen years old at the time of the crimes charged in this case, was sentenced as an adult. There was, however, no written decision to impose adult sanctions setting forth findings of fact and reasons as is required by section 39.-lll(7)(d), Florida Statutes (1987).

¶2*1281Therefore, we reverse the sentences and remand for compliance with the statute.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and FRANK, JJ., concur.
/561/so2d/1280 · .json · Public domain