Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

561 So. 2d 1367

Marcus v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1990-06-15

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1993

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-06-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm Marcus’ convictions but remand for a correction of the sentence for possession of drug paraphernalia.

¶2The state concedes that a scrivener’s error appears in Marcus’ sentence on the charge of possession of drug paraphernalia, in that the space indicating credit for time served as to that count was inadvertently left blank. Therefore, we remand the case solely for the trial court to make that correction of the sentence. The presence of defendant is not necessary.

¶3The convictions are affirmed with directions to correct a scrivener’s error in the sentence.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and SCHEB and PARKER, JJ., concur.
/561/so2d/1367 · .json · Public domain