Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 561 So. 2d 206 - State v. Smith

561 So. 2d 206 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 1992
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Oliveaux · 416 So. 2d 528 - State v. Ratcliff · 389 So. 2d 1263 - State v. Douglas · 542 So. 2d 620 - State v. Schneider · State v. Woods

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Both the United States and Louisiana Constitutions prohibit the imposition of excessive or cruel punishment. U.S.C. Const. Amend. VIII; La. Const, art. I, Sec. 20. A sentence which is grossly disproportionate to the offense or which imposes needless and purposeless pain and suffering is unconstitutionally excessive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.