¶1We affirm the conviction, but reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing. The trial court erred in sentencing the appellant as a habitual offender without making the requisite determination, pursuant to section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1987), that an extended term of imprisonment is necessary for the protection of the public. The newly imposed sentence must be within the guidelines pursuant to Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla.1987).
561 So. 2d 29
Pollard v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 16, 1990
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1990-05-16
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1992
2 state decisions
Relies on 515 So. 2d 748 - Shull v. Dugger
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1990-05-16
View the full empirical analysis of this case →