Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 561 So. 2d 554 - Pope v. State

561 So. 2d 554 - Pope v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

266
cited by 266 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

264 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 266 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 576 So. 2d 281 - State v. Williams (1991), 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State (2000)

264 state decisions

2340199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 478 So. 2d 1054 - State v. Jackson · 515 So. 2d 748 - Shull v. Dugger · Carter v. State · 505 So. 2d 413 - Barbera v. State · 454 So. 2d 691 - Jackson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 266 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when an appellate court reverses a departure sentence because there were no written reasons, the court must remand for resentencing with no possibility of departure from the guidelines.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “at the point of remand valid written reasons for departure”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “must be accompanied by a written statement delineating the reasons for the departure, filed within 7 days after the date of sentencing. A written transcription of orally stated reasons for departure from the guidelines at sentencing is permissible if it is filed by the court within 7 days after the date of sentencing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.