Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

561 So. 2d 589

Docket No. 89-00557.

Foust v. Foust

Russell Atwood FOUST, III, Appellant, v. Dina Darlene Nipper Knorr FOUST, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 5, 1990.

Rehearing Denied February 8, 1990.

This page is marked noindex.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1990-01-05

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1997

3 state decisions

Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 76-13 · Strate v. Strate

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-01-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Russell Atwood Foust, III, pro se.

¶2Stella Diamond of Diamond & Diamond, Fort Myers, for appellee.

¶3RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.

¶4Russell Atwood Foust, III (father) seeks review of the trial court's determination that Dina Foust (mother) be the primary residential parent of their minor child.

¶5Upon consideration of the briefs, the oral arguments and the record before us, this court affirms the judgment entered below, as appellant has made no abuse of discretion appear. Canakaris v. Canakaris,382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980); Strate v. Strate,328 So.2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied,336 So.2d 1184*590 (1976); Fishman v. Fishman,245 So.2d 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971).

¶6The burden of showing error rests on the appellant, because decisions of the lower court reach the appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness. Brackin v. Brackin,190 So.2d 816 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966), cert. denied,201 So.2d 230 (Fla. 1967); Strate; Fishman. Here, no reversible error has been demonstrated. Accordingly, the final judgment and order appealed are affirmed.

¶7Affirmed.

¶8SCHOONOVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

/561/so2d/589 · .json · Public domain