District 6, United Mine Workers of America v. United States Department of the Interior Board of Mine Operations Appeals’s Empirical Analysis
562 F.2d 1260 · 1977
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently April 2002 · most notably Association of Bituminous Contractors, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior, U. S. Department of the Interior. Appeal of United Mine Workers of America. Association of Bituminous Contractors, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior, U. S. Department of the Interior, United Mine Workers of America, Party-Defendant (1978), Laborers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO, Local Union No. 1057 v. National Labor Relations Board (1977)
23 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los Angeles · Federal Trade Commission v. Mandel Bros. · City of Chicago v. Federal Power Commission · Weintraub v. United States · United States v. Pritchett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[q]uestions of legislative intent require the courts, in the last analysis, to reconstruct how the legislature would have decided the specific issue if it had been specifically addressed by the legislature.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio, Local Union No. 1057 v. National Labor Relations Board, United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local 630, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board · Clinchfield Coal Company v. Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, United Mine Workers of America, Intervenor“failure of the operator to comply with a safety standard. We rejected the UMWA's offer to prove that the operator's failure had in fact been”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“completely outside the language of the statute ... [nor] be inconsistent with some of the general objectives of the Act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.