Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 562 F.2d 347 - Houston v. Herring

Houston v. Herring’s Empirical Analysis

562 F.2d 347 · 1977

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
May 2004
most recently cited

38 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently May 2004 · most notably United States v. Evans (1978), Coughlin v. Capitol Cement Co. (1978)

38 federal appellate ·

2601977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. · Troutman v. Southern Railway Co. · Kyzar v. Vale Do Ri Doce Navegacai, S. A.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'The test is not whether the charge was faultless in every particular but whether the jury was misled in any way and whether it had understanding of the issues and its duty to determine those issues.'”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “There is no harmful error if the charge in general correctly instructs, even if one portion is technically incorrect.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “erroneous instructions are not cured by correct instructions in other portions of the charge when 'the charge leaves us with substantial and ineradicable doubt whether the jury has been properly guided in its deliberation.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.