Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

562 F.2d 361

Docket No. 76-2066.

United States v. Tate

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1977-10-17

4 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Tate · United States v. McMahan · United States v. McMahan

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1977-10-17

Victor R. Arditti, El Paso, Tex. (Court-appointed), for Tate.

Bertrand C. Moser, Houston, Tex. (Court-appointed), for Delgado.

Ronald Steve Delgado, FCI, pro se.

Jamie C. Boyd, U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., William B. Hardie, Jr., Michael T. Milligan, Asst. U. S. Attys., El Paso, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, William S. Sessions, Judge, 554 F.2d 1341.

Before GODBOLD, SIMPSON and GEE,* Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

A member of the court in active service having requested a poll on the reconsideration of this cause en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service not having voted in favor of it, rehearing en banc is DENIED.

*

Honorable Thomas Gibbs Gee dissents from the denial of rehearing en banc for the reasons shown in his dissent to the panel opinion

/562/f2d/361 · .json · Public domain