Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 562 F.2d 673 - United States v. Judy E. Martin, United States of America v. Jerome K. Jones

United States v. Judy E. Martin, United States of America v. Jerome K. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

562 F.2d 673 · 1977

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
April 1998
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently April 1998 · most notably United States v. Licata (1985), Campbell v. Greer (1987)

27 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

280197719801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Carroll v. United States · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Adams v. Williams · Chambers v. Maroney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “by the realities of the situation presented „by the record.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) General Rule. For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, fi) evidence that a witness other than an accused has been convicted of a crime shall be admitted, subject to Rule 403, if the crime was punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of one year under the law under which the witness was convicted, and evidence that an accused has been convicted shall be admitted if the court determines that the probative value of admitting this evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect to the accused. (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “reasonable likelihood that the item would be moved before a warrant could be obtained.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.