Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

562 F.3d 711

Docket No. 07-30443.

Thompson v. Connick

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 2009.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2009-03-11

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2009

1 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Relies on Thompson v. Connick

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-03-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Michael L. Banks, John Gordon Cooney, Jr., Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Philadelphia, PA, Robert Glass, Glass & Reed, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

¶2William D. Aaron, Jr., Richard A. Goins, Goins Aaron, PLC, New Orleans, LA, Mark C. Carver, Busch & Myers, LLP, New Orleans, LA, for Defendants-Appellants.

¶3Ralph R. Alexis, III, Porteous, Hainkel & Johnson, New Orleans, LA, Ellis Pete Adams, Jr., La. Dist. Attys Ass’n, Baton Rouge, LA, for Amicus Curiae.

¶4ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

¶5(Opinion Dec. 19, 2008, 5th Cir., 2008, 553 F.3d 836)

¶6Before JONES, Chief Judge, and KING, JOLLY, DAVIS, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, GARZA, BENAVIDES, STEWART, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.1

¶8BY THE COURT:

¶9A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶10IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

/562/f3d/711 · .json · Public domain