Baker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1994
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Hinckley · United States v. Poole · Blalock v. State · Boarman v. State · Freeman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“- IC. § 385-83-5-2(a); see also U.S. Const. amend. IV; Ind. Const. art. I, § 11. Police officers seeking a search warrant are not required to make a prima facie showing of criminal conduct, nor must they demonstrate that contraband will be found on the premis-, es to be searched.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Foster v. State“They need only show that there is a probability of criminal activity. When an affidavit contains such information, the issuing court may draw reasonable inferences therefrom and issue the warrant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Foster v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.