Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 562 N.W.2d 167 - Ollinger v. Bennett

Ollinger v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2016

6 state decisions

40199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Meyer v. Nottger · 14 Utah 2d 135 - King v. Fronk · Green v. City of Cascade · Sille v. Shaffer · Millington v. Kuba

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““the mutual recognition by two adjoining landowners for ten years or more that a line, definitely marked by fence or in some manner, is the dividing line between them. Acquiescence exists when both parties acknowledge and treat the line as the boundary. When the acquiescence persists for ten years the line becomes the true boundary even though a survey may show otherwise and even though neither party intended to claim more than called for by his deed.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) outrageous conduct by the defendant; (2) the defendant’s intentional causing, or reckless disregard of the probability of causing emotional distress; (3) plaintiff suffered severe or extreme emotional distress; (4) actual and proximate cause of the emotional distress by the defendant’s conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]f it is found that the boundaries and corners alleged to have been recognized and acquiesced in for ten years have been so recognized and acquiesced in, such recognized boundaries and corners shall be permanently established.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.