State v. Long’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2019
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Jorn · Arizona v. Washington · Illinois v. Somerville · United States v. Josef Perez · Gori v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A high degree of necessity not absolute necessitymust exist before a mistrial is appropriate.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jaros · State v. Gouleed“had the tape been available prior to trial for [the defendant] to review and listen to ... that may have jogged her memory and would have allowed her to testify accordingly. If it had not jogged her memory ... she would at least know what she had said in her own voice at the time, and it’s unlikely that she would have contradicted herself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. ROESCHELEIN“for the mistrial or the ends of public justice would otherwise be defeated. Illinois v. Somerville, 410 U.S. 458, 461 , 93 S.Ct. 1066 , 35 L.Ed.2d 425 (1973). We have said,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gouleed
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.