Calista Corp. v. DeYoung’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 2019
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1360 · 43 U.S.C. § 1601 (Alaska Land Status Technical Corrections Act of 1992) · 43 U.S.C. § 1606 · 43 U.S.C. § 1620 · 43 U.S.C. § 1621
Relies on 148 Ohio St. 306 - Klein v. United Theaters Co. · 79 Ohio App. 334 - State, Ex Rel. Ickes v. Slinger · In re the Summary Investigation of the Election of Directors of Schwartz & Gray, Inc. · 80 Ohio App. 173 - Klein v. United Theaters Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]his is an equitable action in the nature of a complaint for injunctive relief”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.