Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 562 P2D 916 - Dodson v. State

Dodson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
1
states following
April 1996
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently April 1996 · most notably Chaney v. State (1980), Selsor v. Kaiser (1994)

4 federal appellate · 48 state decisions

350197719801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jones v. State · State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. Freeman · Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. State Ex Rel. Vassar · Box v. State · Dupree v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Two or more defendants may be charged in the same indictment or information if they are alleged to have participated in the same act or transaction or in the same series of acts or transactions constituting an offense or offenses. Such defendants may be charged in one or more counts together or separately, provided that all of the defendants charged together in the same indictment or information are alleged to have participated in all of the same acts or transactions charged.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he question of excessiveness of punishment is to be determined by a study of all the facts and circumstances surrounding each individual case, and we do not have the power to modify a sentence unless we can conscientiously say that under all the facts and circumstances the sentence was so excessive as to shock the conscience of the Court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “If it appears that a defendant ... is prejudiced by joinder ... defendants in an indictment or information or by such joinder for trial together, the court shall ... grant a severance of defendants, or provide whatever other relief justice requires.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.