Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 562 So. 2d 12 - State v. Hill

562 So. 2d 12 - State v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2018

8 state decisions

40199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 494 So. 2d 1251 - State v. Rogers · State v. Marchand · 412 So. 2d 584 - State v. Mose · State v. Parker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The purposes of sequestration are to insulate the jurors from outside influence, or the possibility thereof, and to insure that their verdict will be based upon the evidence developed at trial. State v. Parker, supra [ 372 So.2d 1037 (La. 1979)]; State v. Marchand, 362 So.2d 1090 (La.1978). So strictly is the prophylactic rule enforced that upon separation of the jury a presumption of prejudice arises which may only be rebutted if it affirmatively appears that no prejudice to the accused could have resulted.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]n noncapital cases, the jury shall be sequestered after the court's charge and may be sequestered at any time upon order of the court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “1. status of the defendant as a convicted felon; 2. physical and/or constructive possession by the defendant; and 3. the instrumentality possessed was a firearm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.