562 So. 2d 1304 - Ex Parte Washington’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

9 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “' See U.S. v. Berkowitz , 662 F.2d [1127] at 1132 [(5th Cir. 1981)].”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Ex Parte Alabama State Tenure Com'n · 804 So. 2d 247 - Hardy v. State

2. “" 'We agree that, "antagonistic defenses do not per se require severance, even if the defendants are hostile or attempt to case the blame on each other." United States v. Arruda , 715 F.2d 671 , 679 (1st Cir. 1983). "Antagonism of defenses requires severance only where the defenses are so inconsistent that the jury would have to believe one defendant at the expense of the other; the conflict alone establishes the guilt of a defendant." United States v. Drougas , 748 F.2d 8 , 20 (1st Cir. 1984). "[S]everance is required because of 'mutually antagonistic defenses' only when the defenses are so antagonistic that 'the acceptance of one party's defense will preclude the acquittal of the other.' " United States v. Hendrix , 752 F.2d 1226 , 1232 (7th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Merritt v. United States , 471 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 2032 , 85 L.Ed.2d 314 (1985).' "”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 804 So. 2d 247 - Hardy v. State · 624 So. 2d 202 - Greathouse v. State

3. “' United States v. Hendrix, 752 F.2d 1226, 1232 (7th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Merritt v. United States, 471 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 2032 , 85 L.Ed.2d 314 (1985).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 804 So. 2d 247 - Hardy v. State