Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 562 So. 2d 306 - Cain v. State

562 So. 2d 306 - Cain v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 1999
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Spencer v. State of Texas a Bell · Hagemann v. American Savings & Loan Ass'n · Marathon Oil Co. v. United States · 511 So. 2d 225 - Nelson v. State · 500 So. 2d 1204 - Hubbard v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he obvious purpose of [using a prior conviction as an element of the charged offense is to] ensure that the accused is fully advised and informed of the nature and extent of the offense for which he stands charged. The aggravating circumstance is a statutory element of the crime which must be alleged and proven.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.