Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 562 SO2D 359 - Baggett v. State

Baggett v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · 513 So. 2d 1057 - Florida Bar v. Hosner · Dixon v. State · 514 So. 2d 1149 - Walker v. State · 504 So. 2d 798 - State v. Riehl

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Hypodermic syringes have legitimate medical purposes so that in every instance they cannot be said to constitute drug paraphernalia....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the proximity of the object, in time and space, to a direct violation of [the Utah Drug Paraphernalia Act],”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “statements by an owner or by anyone in control of the object concerning its use,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.