562 So. 2d 375 - Roby v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
February 2002
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 428 So. 2d 235 - Mondy v. Mondy · 487 So. 2d 345 - Hamill v. Bower · O'Connor v. O'Connor · 370 So. 2d 383 - Detko/Roberts v. Stikelether · 447 So. 2d 335 - Herrero v. Matas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) If a court of another state has made a custody decree, a court of this state shall not modify that decree unless: (a) It appears to the court of this state that the court which rendered the decree does not now have jurisdiction under jurisdictional prerequisites substantially in accordance with this act or has declined to assume jurisdiction to modify the decree; and (b) The court of this state has jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Yurgel v. Yurgel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.