Ex Parte Frazier’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 58 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently December 2013 · most notably 666 So. 2d 91 - Brownlee v. State (1995), 629 So. 2d 6 - Hallford v. State (1993)
1 federal appellate · 58 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Imbler v. Pachtman · Ake v. Oklahoma · Pennsylvania v. Finley · Bibby v. United States · Briscoe v. W
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to grant a motion for new trial alleging perjured testimony, the trial court must be reasonably well satisfied 1) that testimony given by a witness at trial was false; 2) that there is a significant chance that had the jury heard the truth, it would have reached a different result; 3) that the evidence tending to prove the witness's perjury has been discovered since the trial; and 4) that that evidence could not have been discovered before or during trial by the exercise of due diligence.”
21 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Hall v. Thomas · McMillian v. State““Both the Alabama and United States Constitutions protect a citizen of this state from being deprived of life or liberty without ‘due process of law.’ Ala. Const, of 1901, Art. I, § 6; U.S. Const. Amend. XIV. The phrase ‘due process of law,’ although incapable of a precise definition, in its most basic sense encompasses the observation of that degree of fundamental fairness that is essential to our concept of justice.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Vann v. State · Abdeldayem v. State“"we must strike a proper balance between our interest in preserving the finality of judgments, and, thus, promoting the efficient administration of criminal justice, and our interest in safeguarding the rights of the accused. A careful balancing of these concerns is, in our view, necessary to foster stability and confidence in the judicial system."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Wells v. State · Ashford v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.