Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 562 SO2D 630 - Austin v. State

Austin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2003
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Smith v. Hooey · Cogdell v. United States · United States v. Avalos · United States v. Bufalino

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “prevented his parole, affected his inmate classification status, affected his work release eligibility, and affected the possibility that he could attend trade school.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.