Zerillo v. Snapper Power Equipment’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2011
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 557 So. 2d 34 - Slaughter v. State · Pelle v. Diners Club · Carmichael v. SHELLEY TRACTOR & EQUIP · 550 So. 2d 1142 - Sheldon Greene and Associates, Inc. v. Williams Island Associates · SJS ENTERPRISES INC. v. Cates
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is fundamental that the constitutional guarantee of due process, which extends into every proceeding, requires that the opportunity to be heard be full and fair, not merely colorable or illusive.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. An v. MF-A. · A.N. v. M.F.-A.“[A] party may not obtain a directed verdict prior to the time that the party moved against has completed his case-in-chief, since to do so would constitute a denial of due process of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“at the close of the evidence offered by the adverse party....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.