State v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · Frye v. United States · Ed Peters Jewelry Co. v. C & J Jewelry Co. · State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. McDonagh
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No single factor is necessarily dispositive of the reliability of a particular expert's testimony.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“we are guided by existing and still applicable Missouri law and the federal jurisprudence on this matter, including the seminal case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“trial courts must act as gatekeepers to ensure that the testimony sought to be admitted . . . 'is not only relevant, but reliable.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.