Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 563 A2D 1077 - Williams v. Ray

Williams v. Ray’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 2012

16 state decisions

901989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. United States · In re Disbarment of Cooper · Miller v. Avirom · District of Columbia v. Air Florida, Inc. · Chase v. Gilbert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[b]ecause the appeal is not entirely frivolous, sanctions are not appropriate”). 13 . -At oral argument Slater's counsel contended that an award of costs and attorneys’ fees would be inequitable because Biehl’s brief mentions a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.