In re Morales’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 1329 · 11 U.S.C. § 521
Relies on Hamilton v. Lanning · Hamilton v. Lanning · Hardy v. Fink · In Re Royal · In Re Michaud
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“either by saving the amounts received from the tax credits and using them to pay expenses during the year, or by delaying paying bills and deferring purchases until she received the tax credits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Marshall v. Blake“If debtors account for their expected income and tax expense correctly at the time of confirmation, tax refunds need not be paid as additional plan payments.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Marshall v. Blake“the trustee's approach eliminates entirely the 'expenses' component from the statutory formula for plan payments ... when the income is received annually.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Marshall v. Blake
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.