Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 563 F.2d 339 - Nimrod T. Solomon v. Charles L. Benson, Warden

Nimrod T. Solomon v. Charles L. Benson, Warden’s Empirical Analysis

563 F.2d 339 · 1977

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
December 2003
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently December 2003 · most notably Shango v. Jurich (1982), Pugliese v. Nelson (1980)

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

1701977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Kastigar v. United States · Meachum v. Fano · Moody v. Daggett · Montanye v. Haymes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. . In Meachum v. Fano , . no due process protections were required upon the discretionary transfer of state prisoners to a substantially less agreeable prison, even where that transfer visited a ‘grievous loss’ upon the inmate. The same is true of prisoner classification and eligibility for rehabilitative programs in the federal system. Congress has given federal prison officials full discretion to control these conditions of confinement, 18 U.S.C. § 4081 , and petitioner has no legitimate statutory or constitutional entitlement sufficient to invoke due process. Id. at 88 n.9, 97 S.Ct. at 279 n.9. [emphasis added]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.